{"id":68883,"date":"2023-12-11T18:21:34","date_gmt":"2023-12-11T18:21:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/talkcelnews.com\/?p=68883"},"modified":"2023-12-11T18:21:34","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T18:21:34","slug":"voice-question-should-have-been-split-wyatt-says","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/talkcelnews.com\/lifestyle\/voice-question-should-have-been-split-wyatt-says\/","title":{"rendered":"Voice question should have been split, Wyatt says"},"content":{"rendered":"
Add articles to your saved list and come back to them any time.<\/p>\n
Former Indigenous affairs minister Ken Wyatt says the Voice referendum was too complicated and should have split out the question of recognition as he called on national cabinet to urgently focus on closing the gap and reviewing billions in annual Indigenous spending.<\/p>\n
One of the key conservative supporters of the October referendum \u2013 which was rejected by 60 per cent of Australians and rapidly faded as a point of political debate \u2013 said many Indigenous Australians and their leaders were still grieving but he hoped deep frustration and rejection would lead to fresh ideas.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Ken Wyatt says it will be viewed as a historic shame that two separate questions were not asked in the referendum.<\/span>Credit: <\/span>Alex Ellinghausen<\/cite><\/p>\n \u201cThe Indigenous leadership across this nation should take the position that we\u2019ve had many setbacks over the 230-odd years of this nation and the setback of the referendum is not the endpoint,\u201d Wyatt said in an interview.<\/p>\n \u201cChange has to happen in this nation. We cannot continue for another 50 years without seeing pragmatic results on the ground. We cannot tolerate the gaps.\u201d<\/p>\n National cabinet and a new federal taskforce focused on failures to close the gap on Indigenous disadvantage should \u201cbite the bullet and deal with the targets in a very concerted, pragmatic way,\u201d Wyatt said.<\/p>\n Chief Voice proponents including Noel Pearson have not spoken publicly since the October 14 poll. Labor has not released new policies to reverse dire health, education and criminal justice statistics despite Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney hinting at new announcements on referendum night.<\/p>\n In his first interview since the referendum, Wyatt gave the most frank public appraisal of the Voice campaign by any of its proponents.<\/p>\n Regional and local voices should have been legislated before a referendum to prove their value and operation, he argued, as previously advocated by figures including Wyatt, academic Marcia Langton and former Labor leader Bill Shorten.<\/p>\n Wyatt said it would be viewed as a historic shame that two separate questions were not asked: one on symbolic recognition in the Constitution of the unique status of First Australians and the other on the Indigenous advisory body to parliament.<\/p>\n \u201cPeople I spoke to said had it been recognition I would have agreed to it but I wasn\u2019t comfortable with an enshrined Voice,\u201d Wyatt said, adding the entire Yes movement, including himself, bore blame for the outcome.<\/p>\n \u201cThe quagmire that developed wasn\u2019t responded to. The quicksands of uncertainty became the glue that lost the vote.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019ve got to remember that referendums are the toughest campaign to win unless you have absolute clarity and can answer with precision and provide people with a strong sense of comfort that this \u2026 doesn\u2019t impact, as I heard somebody say, on their backyards.<\/p>\n \u201cI think there was a high degree of confidence that this would get over the line, even if it was in the low 50s. I don\u2019t think too many people turned their minds, and this is the majority of those within the parliament, [to] what was plan B should this fail?\u201d<\/p>\n Indigenous leaders at the landmark 2017 Uluru convention rejected symbolic recognition and opted for a more powerful form of reconciliation in the Voice.<\/p>\n The Turnbull and Morrison-era minister \u2013 who previously lashed Opposition Leader Peter Dutton for negative referendum tactics and quit the Liberal Party in April \u2013 raised internal concerns earlier this year about divisions within the Yes campaign.<\/p>\n \u201cIf there hadn\u2019t been four groups in the Yes camp, would the outcome have been different?\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The West Australian was horrified to hear a politician tell him privately the resounding referendum defeat meant political leaders at different levels of government would be scared of the electoral implications of proposing Indigenous advancement policies.<\/p>\n Wyatt said the crushing loss necessitated a new approach to Indigenous affairs.<\/p>\n Nearly 30 per cent of the tens of billions of dollars spent on Indigenous Australians each year was absorbed by administrative costs, he said, while the outcomes of spending audits were often ignored.<\/p>\n \u201cSo the perception Australians have is that all this money goes into Aboriginal affairs, but we\u2019re seeing no change,\u201d he said. \u201cHistorically, funding has been given to individuals to run significant programs, but they\u2019ve never been reviewed.\u201d<\/p>\n While devastating Aboriginal Australians, Wyatt said the referendum had the positive effect of heightening awareness of Indigenous disadvantage and spawning the next generation of Indigenous leaders he said could enter parliament, including Dean Parkin and Rachel Perkins.<\/p>\n Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nMost Viewed in Politics<\/h2>\n
From our partners<\/h3>\n